Compare

Vitrus vs. Plausible

Same privacy stance, plus a proof layer. Plausible is the best-known name in privacy-first analytics and has earned that reputation. Vitrus shares the same foundation — cookie-free, lightweight, open source — and adds one layer on top: AI summaries, and the evidence behind them.

Get started free Read the docs

Feature comparison

CapabilityPlausibleVitrus
Cookie-free, no consent banner✓✓
Self-hostableAGPL, 3 servicesApache-2.0, single process
Services to runElixir + Postgres + ClickHousenone (embedded)
Ordered funnelspaid plans✓
Proactive digest (arrives unasked)spike alerts✓
AI referral ↔ AI crawler splitAI channel, no crawler split✓
User journeys / path analysis✓✓
Core Web Vitals—✓
JavaScript error tracking404 pages only✓
Session replay—opt-in, all text masked by default
Clickable query behind every number—✓
Unprovable AI sentences auto-dropped—✓
Local LLM / bring your own key—✓
MCP server for AI agents—✓
Revenue tracking✓per currency, never converted
Scroll depth✓✓
Import history from another toolGoogle Analytics, CSVUmami only, so far
Google Search Console✓read-only, Google's answer as evidence
Public stats API with API keys✓read-only keys
Community and docs maturitybroadnew

Features we don't have are shown as “—”. A comparison that hides its own gaps would contradict the one thing this product claims.

When to choose Plausible

If you want a clean traffic dashboard and have no use for an AI layer, Plausible is mature, calm and very well maintained. It also does several things we do not: it imports your Google Analytics history (and CSV exports), tracks scroll depth, and embeds a dashboard in your own site. Their community and documentation are broader than ours, and their managed cloud has a much longer track record.

When to choose Vitrus

When you want more than the number — a checkable answer to "why did it change?" — or when you need AI assistant traffic separated from AI crawlers.

Frequently asked

Can I import my Plausible history?

Not yet — that is the honest answer. For now we suggest running both scripts side by side for a while and comparing.

What actually differs when self-hosting?

Plausible CE needs three services (Elixir, PostgreSQL, ClickHouse) and ClickHouse alone idles around 600 MB of RAM. Vitrus runs as one process with an embedded database; there is no second service to install.

Surveying the whole landscape?

Other comparisons: